Volume 102, Issue 6 p. 646-652
Original article

Magnetic sentinel node and occult lesion localization in breast cancer (MagSNOLL Trial)

M. Ahmed

M. Ahmed

Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK

Department of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
B. Anninga

B. Anninga

Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
S. Goyal

S. Goyal

Departments of Breast Surgery, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
P. Young

P. Young

Departments of Breast Radiology, University Hospital Llandough, Cardiff, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Q. A. Pankhurst

Q. A. Pankhurst

Institute of Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
M. Douek

Corresponding Author

M. Douek

Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, London, UK

Department of Breast Surgery, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK

Correspondence to: Mr M. Douek, Research Oncology, Division of Cancer Studies, King's College London, 3rd Floor Bermondsey Wing, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London SE1 9RT, UK (e-mail: [email protected])Search for more papers by this author
the MagSNOLL Trialists Group

the MagSNOLL Trialists Group

Other members of the MagSNOLL Trialists Group are co-authors of this study and can be found under the heading CollaboratorsSearch for more papers by this author
First published: 13 April 2015
Citations: 40
Presented to the 37th Annual Breast Cancer Symposium, San Antonio, Texas, USA, December 2014

Abstract

Background

Non-palpable breast cancers require localization-guided surgery and axillary staging using sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). This study investigated the novel technique of magnetic-guided lesion localization and concurrent SLNB, which avoids the need for wire-guided localization and radioisotopes.

Methods

An ultrasound-guided intratumoral injection of magnetic tracer (0·5 ml) was performed in a protocol-driven predefined minimum of ten patients with palpable breast cancer to assess the ability of the magnetic tracer safely to localize the tumour at the site of injection and concurrently drain to the lymphatics. Once successful lesion localization had been confirmed (peak magnetometer count retained at the centre of the tumour), the technique was undertaken in a further 20 patients with non-palpable breast cancers awaiting wide local excision and SLNB. All patients underwent SLNB with both the magnetic and standard dual (radioisotope and Patent Blue V dye) techniques.

Results

Thirty-two patients were recruited, of whom 12 (1 with bilateral disease) presented with palpable and 20 with non-palpable breast cancer. Peak magnetometer counts were retained at the tumour centre in all palpable (13) and non-palpable (20) breast cancers. Re-excisions for involved margins were necessary in two patients with non-palpable breast cancers. The sentinel lymph node identification rates were 28 of 33 procedures for the magnetic technique alone, 32 of 33 for the magnetic technique combined with blue dye, and 32 of 33 for the standard dual technique.

Conclusion

Magnetic lesion localization is feasible, with intratumoral magnetic tracer injection combined with a periareolar injection of blue dye for subsequent SNLB.

Journal list menu